HOCANM13996527
PROGENESIS WOLFGANG
WOLFGANG
200HO12303
| Name | Abb. | Carrier Probability |
|---|---|---|
| Early Onset Muscle Weakness | MW | 0% |
| Cholesterol Deficiency | CD | 1% |
| Brachyspina | BY | 0% |
| Complex Vertebral Malformation | CVM | 0% |
| Bovine Leucocyte Adhesion Deficiency | BLAD | 0% |
| Deficiency of Uridine Monophosphate Synthase | DUMPS | 0% |
| Mulefoot | MF | 1% |
| Haplotypes Affecting Fertility | Abb. | Carrier Probability |
| 1 | HH1 | 1% |
| 2 | HH2 | 1% |
| 3 | HH3 | 1% |
| 4 | HH4 | 1% |
| 5 | HH5 | 1% |
| 6 | HH6 | 99% |
Born 23-JAN-21
INB 14.96%
R 21%
LPI
| 3616 |
|---|
| Rel: 81% %RK: 99 |
Pro$
| $2523 |
|---|
Production
GPA 25*AUG| Kg | %RK | %Dev | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Herds | Milk | -164 | 23 | ||
| Daughters/Lactations | Fat | 99 | 89 | +0.91 | |
| Rel | 85 | Protein | 45 | 66 | +0.41 |
LPI Subindexes
| Offical LPI | |
|---|---|
| Production (PI) | 40% |
| Longevity & Type (LTI) | 32% |
| Health & Welfare (HWI) | 8% |
| Reproduction (RI) | 10% |
| Milkability (MI) | 5% |
| Environmental Impact (EI) | 5% |
| Rating | %RK |
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Production | 673 | 95 |
![]() ![]() |
|||
| Longevity & Type | 573 | 76 |
![]() ![]() |
|||
| Health & Welfare | 703 | 98 |
![]() ![]() |
|||
| Reproduction | 647 | 94 |
![]() ![]() |
|||
| Milkability | 568 | 75 |
![]() ![]() |
|||
| Environmental Impact | 508 | 51 |
![]() ![]() |
|||
Conformation
GPA 25*AUGHerds:
Daughters:
Rel: 82%
| Rating | %RK |
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conformation | -1 | 43 |
![]() ![]() |
|||
| Mammary System | 2 | 65 |
![]() ![]() |
|||
| Feet & Legs | 1 | 59 |
![]() ![]() |
|||
| Dairy Strength | -7 | 8 |
![]() ![]() |
|||
| Rump | 0 | 46 |
![]() ![]() |
|||
| Rating | %RK |
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Udder Texture | 4 | Fleshy |
![]() ![]() |
Soft | ||
| Median Suspensory | -3 | Weak |
![]() ![]() |
Strong | ||
| Fore Attachment | 1 | Weak |
![]() ![]() |
Strong | ||
| Rear Attachment Height | -2 | Low |
![]() ![]() |
High | ||
| Rear Attachment Width | -1 | Narrow |
![]() ![]() |
Wide | ||
| Foot Angle | 0 | Low |
![]() ![]() |
Steep | ||
| Heel Depth | 3 | Shallow |
![]() ![]() |
Deep | ||
| Bone Quality | 6 | Coarse |
![]() ![]() |
Flat | ||
| Rear Legs Rear View | -1 | Hocked-in |
![]() ![]() |
Straight | ||
| Locomotion | -5 | Non-mobile |
![]() ![]() |
Mobile | ||
| Height at Front End | 2 | Low |
![]() ![]() |
High | ||
| Chest Width | -9 | Narrow |
![]() ![]() |
Wide | ||
| Body Depth | -9 | Shallow |
![]() ![]() |
Deep | ||
| Rib Structure | 0 | Non-Angular |
![]() ![]() |
Angular | ||
| Loin Strength | -4 | Weak |
![]() ![]() |
Strong | ||
| Pin Width | 0 | Narrow |
![]() ![]() |
Wide | ||
Intermediate Optimum
| Rating | %RK | Extreme | Average | Extreme | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Udder Floor | 8 T | Tilt |
![]() ![]() |
Reverse Tilt | ||
| Udder Depth | 2 S | Deep |
![]() ![]() |
Shallow | ||
| Front Teat Placement | 1 C | Wide |
![]() ![]() |
Close | ||
| Rear Teat Placement | 2 C | Wide |
![]() ![]() |
Close | ||
| Teat Length | 3 L | Short |
![]() ![]() |
Long | ||
| Rear Legs Side View | 1 S | Straight |
![]() ![]() |
Curved | ||
| Front Leg View | 9 K | Knock Kneed |
![]() ![]() |
Straight | ||
| Stature | 1 T | Short |
![]() ![]() |
Tall | ||
| Rump Angle | 2 L | High |
![]() ![]() |
Low | ||
| Thurl Placement | 3 A | Back |
![]() ![]() |
Ahead | ||
Functional
| Rating | Rel | Difference from Breed Average (SD) |
Daughter Perf.Dtr. Perf.
?
Trait definitions for the expected average daughter performance expressed as a deviation from daughters of a breed average sire: ME: kg change in methane production per year FE: kg change in dry matter intake per lactation after 60 DIM BMR: kg change in dry matter intake per year to meet maintenance requirements HL: % of daughters surviving to fourth calving MR: % healthy daughters for clinical mastitis MDR: % healthy daughters with no clinical or subclinical disease during the transition period after calving HH: % daughters with no hoof lesion observed at trimming CH: % healthy daughters with no case of either Diarrhea or Respiratory Problems LP: % Milk yield at 280 DIM versus 60 DIM DO: Days open MSP: % daughters scored average, fast or very fast milkers MT: % daughters scored average, calm or very calm temperament CA: % progeny born from first calf heifers that are unassisted or easy and alive DCA: % of daughter first calvings that are unassisted or easy with an alive calf BCS: BCS points on 1-5 scale |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methane Efficiency | 101 GPA | 84% | Poor |
![]() ![]() |
Efficient | -0.6 kg |
| Feed Efficiency | 96 GPA | 56% | Poor |
![]() ![]() |
Efficient | +70.8 kg |
| Body Maintenance Requirements | 103 GPA | 70% | High |
![]() ![]() |
Low | -39.6 kg |
| Herd Life | 108 GPA | 86% | Short |
![]() ![]() |
Long | +9.5 % |
| Mastitis Resistance | 110 GPA | 70% | Susceptible |
![]() ![]() |
Resistant | +3.8 % |
| Metabolic Disease Resistance | 106 GPA | 72% | Susceptible |
![]() ![]() |
Resistant | +3.8 % |
| Hoof Health | 101 GPA | 75% | Susceptible |
![]() ![]() |
Resistant | +1.4 % |
| Calf Health | 103 GPA | 73% | Susceptible |
![]() ![]() |
Resistant | +3.3 % |
| Lactation Persistency | 100 GPA | 80% | Poor |
![]() ![]() |
High | +0 % |
| Daughter Fertility | 107 GPA | 78% | Poor |
![]() ![]() |
High | -6.7 d |
| Milking Speed | 99 GPA | 81% | Slow |
![]() ![]() |
Fast | -0.8 % |
| Milking Temperament | 100 GPA | 77% | Nervous |
![]() ![]() |
Calm | +0 % |
| Calving Ability | 108 GPA | 84% | Difficult |
![]() ![]() |
Easy | +4.6 % |
| Daughter Calving Ability | 106 GPA | 77% | Difficult |
![]() ![]() |
Easy | +6.8 % |
| Body Condition Score | 96 GPA | 84% | Low |
![]() ![]() |
High | -0.04 pts |

